Challenges and Opportunities of the Taliban in the Process of State Building in Afghanistan: Post-American Departures

Authors

  • Siti Mutiah Setiawati Department of International Relations, Universitas Gadjah Mada Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70214/5ff6ym54

Keywords:

State Building, Taliban, Afghanistan, Immara, Challenge

Abstract

The withdrawal of United States troops in 2020 marked the end of the 20-year War on Terror, triggering a quick takeover of Kabul by the Taliban. This article analyzes the potential and challenges in the process of “state-building” in Afghanistan under Taliban rule, which includes the establishment of political, social, economic systems, as well as national identity. Economic dependence on foreigners and the Taliban's status as a terrorist group were the main obstacles, while people's desire to improve their living standards and support for the Islamic political system, Imarah Islam Afghanistan (IIA), were the main drivers. A qualitative approach through literature review and in-depth interviews was used for this research. Findings show that the Taliban's classification as terrorists limits global support, although the IIA offers an institutional alternative. Domestic and global obstacles are expected to test the sustainability of the Taliban regime in building a stable state.

References

Abdul, F. (2022). From Taliban Rule to Taliban Rule: An Analysis of Nation-building Efforts in Afghanistan, the Role of Religion and its Outcome for Women and Minorities. Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Barfield, T. J. (2012). Afghanistan: A Cultural and Political History. NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bizhan, N. (2018). Aid and State-Building, Part II: Afghanistan And Iraq. Third World Quarterly, 39(5), 1014–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1447369

Boni, F. (2021). Afghanistan 2020: The US-Taliban peace deal, intra-Afghan talks and regional implications, Asia Maior. The Journal of the Italian Think Tank on Asia Founded by Giorgio Borsa in 1989. PhD Thesis, The Open University, 465–478. https://oro.open.ac.uk/78505/

Brown, V. F. (2021). The US decision to withdraw from Afghanistan is the right one. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-us-decision-to-withdraw-from-afghanistan-is-the-right-one/

Chesterman, S. (2002). Walking Softly in Afghanistan: the Future of UN State-Building. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 44(3), 37–45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00396330212331343402

Dobbins, J. (2008). After the Taliban: nation-building in Afghanistan. Potomac Books.

Johnson, T. H. (2006). Afghanistan’s post-Taliban transition: the state of state-building after war. Central Asian Survey, 25(1–2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634930600902991

Marquette, H. (2011). Donors, State Building and Corruption: lessons from Afghanistan and the implications for aid policy. Third World Quarterly, 32, 1871–1890. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41341203

Miklaucic, M. (2023). State-Building 101: Hard Lessons From Afghanistan. Armed Forces & Society, 49(4), 982–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X221088873

Rodríguez, E. B. (2023). Why Did State-Building Policy Fail in Afghanistan? Open Journal of Political Science, 129–154. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2023.131008

Salt, A. (2018). Transformation and the war in Afghanistan / Alexander Salt. Transformation and the War in Afghanistan / Alexander Salt., 2014, 98–126. https://doi.org/10.29171/azu_acku_pamphlet_ds371_4_s358_2018

Ullah, Hafeez, Ahmad, Riaz, K. M. M. (2020). Afghanistan: US-Taliban Peace Talks: CPEC Perspective. Conflict Studies Quarterly, 32. https://doi.org/10.24193/csq.32.4

Weigand, F. (2017). Afghanistan’s Taliban–legitimate jihadists or coercive extremists? Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 11(3), 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2017.1353755

Downloads

Published

2024-12-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Setiawati, S. M. . (2024). Challenges and Opportunities of the Taliban in the Process of State Building in Afghanistan: Post-American Departures. International Journal of Politics and Public Policy, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.70214/5ff6ym54