The Role of Oposition Parties: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70214/07s9tm24Keywords:
Political, Society, Democracy, Government, RelationsAbstract
Opposition parties in Indonesia today, especially during President Jokowi's first government period (2014-2019) and second period (2019-2024), many have failed to carry out their function as political watchdogs and cooperate well with the government, which has resulted in instability in the landscape. state politics. This research aims to understand the impact of party opposition on the stability of Indonesian democracy. The research methodology used in this research is a systematic literature review using 192 scientific articles sourced from the Scopus database. Articles reviewed using the Vosviewer application. Based on the findings of this research, opposition parties have a significant impact on the development of democracy in the Indonesian political system because they provide good stability for the reform of the country's political system. Opposition parties in parliament have different methods from the agreed government. Opposition parties can work together in various ways, for example by criticizing government policies.
References
Ahmad, S. R., & Khan, I. A. (2023). External governance mechanisms and capital structure: A cross-country analysis. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 6(4), 994–1005. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i4.2216
Alper, K., & Lancaster, C. M. (2023). The strength of attachment: Regionalism, nationalism and vote choice. West European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2253514
Balasubramaniam, R. R. (2022). Dislodging Malaysia’s culture of domination. In Regime resilience: In Malaysia and Singapore (pp. 245–257). World Scientific Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811268663_0017
Burlock, H. (2022). Party politics: Dancing in London’s West End, 1780–9. London Journal, 47(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2021.1978764
Firdiansyah, M. A., Firdaus, M., Fatah, A., & Benihingan, A. (2024). Analysis of PSI and PDIP Political Marketing Strategies in the 2024 Election. Journal International of Politic and Public Policy (IJPPP), 1(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70214/3s04rp43
Gharti, I. (2022). Thicker than blood: Political parties, partisanship, and the indigenous identity movement in Nepal. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences, 45(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljss.v45i2.8287
Gherghina, S., & Bankov, P. (2023). Troublemakers and game changers: How political parties stopped democratic backsliding in Bulgaria. Democratization, 30(8), 1582–1603. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2250985
Hohendorf, L., Saalfeld, T., & Sieberer, U. (2020). Veto power fosters cooperative behaviour: institutional incentives and government-opposition voting in the German Bundestag. West European Politics, 44, 921–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1739868
Hatab, S. (2023). The rise and fall of political outsiders: Political opportunity structure and (de-)mobilization in Paraguay (2008–2012). International Journal of Comparative Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152231196320
Hinfelaar, M., Rakner, L., Sishuwa, S., & van de Walle, N. (2022). Legal autocratisation ahead of the 2021 Zambian elections. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 16(4), 558–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2022.2235658
Hjermitslev, I. B. (2023). Between cabinet membership and opposition: Commitment and responsibility of support parties. Party Politics, 29(5), 981–987. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221104557
Irwin, D. (2023). Business interest groups in a one-party state: The case of Vietnam. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 12(2), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-023-00188-1
Jackman, D., & Maitrot, M. (2022). The party-police nexus in Bangladesh. Journal of Development Studies, 58(8), 1516–1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2022.2055463
Jaja, T. C., & Aditya, Z. F. (2022). Promoting the Good Governance by Advancing the Role of Parliamentarians And The Term Offices Limitation (Comparing Nigeria And Indonesia). Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(1), 265–298. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.54776
Jha, C. K. (2023). Condoning corruption: Who votes for corrupt political parties? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 215, 74–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.08.026
Kaul, V. (2023). Liberalism and the problem of domination. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 49(5), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537231172814
Kazlauskaitė, R., & Salmela, M. (2022). Mediated emotions: Shame and pride in Polish right-wing media coverage of the 2019 European Parliament elections. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(1), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1952551
Kefale, A. (2023). Social media, political transition and conflict in Ethiopia. In Digital technologies, elections and campaigns in Africa (pp. 64–74). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003429081-5
Kirkaldy, A. (2022). Introduction and author’s note. In Palgrave studies in the history of social movements (pp. 1–9). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83921-5_1
Lee, M., Ha, S. E., & Lee, W. (2023). Do political parties always prefer loyalists? Evidence from South Korea. PLoS ONE, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291336
Mietzner, M., & Honna, J. (2023). Elite opposition and popular rejection: The failure of presidential term limit evasion in Widodo’s Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 31(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2023.2236542
Mladenović, I. (2022). Considerations on democracy in Rawls’s A Theory of Justice. Prolegomena, 21(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.26362/20220102
Saidin, M. I. S. (2023). Malaysia’s crisis of political legitimacy: Understanding the 2020 power transition and ‘Sheraton Move’ polemics through the ‘eyes’ of Malaysian political science graduates. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2222572
Sitandang, G. R., & Firdaus, M. (2024). Research trends of opposition political parties in the world : A systematic literature review. Journal International of Politic and Public Policy (IJPPP), 1(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70214/xj6fmk36
Stewart, P. A., Lee, N., Bucy, E. P., & Senior, C. (2023). Emotional response to U.K. political party leader facial displays of affiliation, reward, and ambiguity during Brexit. Social Science Quarterly, 104(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13235
Yu, X., Wojcieszak, M., & Casas, A. (2023). Partisanship on social media: In-party love among American politicians, greater engagement with out-party hate among ordinary users. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09850-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Internasional Journal of Politics and Public Policy (IJPPP)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms.
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png?raw=true)
.jpg?raw=true)
