Political Space of Society Studies: A Systematic Siterature Review (SLR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70214/b4gtg349Keywords:
Political, Society, Democracy, Government, RelationsAbstract
This article aims to review literature regarding community political space, including the concept, forms of participation, factors that influence it, and the challenges faced in Indonesia. The research method used in this research is Systematic Literature Review (SLR) by analyzing 150 scientific articles sourced from the Scopus Database. Article review using the Vosviewer application. The research results show that community political space is characterized as a forum for social participation and political decision making. There are two types of community political participation: traditional ones such as elections and unconventional ones such as protests. The political system, the degree of community political awareness, and civil rights are some of the variables that influence this. It is hoped that the findings of this research will make a significant contribution to the field of aspirational politics research and influence future discussions and investigations. The fact that this research paper only draws from the Scopus database means that its conclusions cannot fully capture political ambitions around the world.
References
Arzmi, A., & Wahid, J. (2023). Theorizing the postcolonial city of Kuching: the socio-spatial production of colonial logistics. Planning Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2023.2235669
Chaney, P. (2022). Shrinking Civil Space? Exploring State and Civil Society Perspectives on the Contemporary Situation of Human Rights Defenders in South Asia. Journal of South Asian Development, 17(3), 382–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731741221119935
Cheeseman, N., & Dodsworth, S. (2023). Defending Civic Space: When are Campaigns against Repressive Laws Successful? Journal of Development Studies, 59(5), 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2022.2162882
Díaz-Castro, L., Ramírez-Rojas, M. G., Cabello-Rangel, H., Sánchez-Osorio, E., & Velázquez-Posada, M. (2022). The Analytical Framework of Governance in Health Policies in the Face of Health Emergencies: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.628791
Eltiaminia, R., & Qanbari, D. (2023). Ethnic Politics in Russia and its Impact on Extremism in the North Caucasus. Central Eurasia Studies, 15(2), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.22059/jcep.2023.304933.449936
Filgueiras, F. (2023). Designing artificial intelligence policy: Comparing design spaces in Latin America. Latin American Policy, 14(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12282
Gardini, E. (2022). The Technocratic Reason in the Government of Emergency. A Theoretical Analysis on the Management of the Covid-19 Epidemic. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3), 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v15i3p761
Jezierska, K. (2023). Coming out of the liberal closet. Think tanks and de-democratization in Poland. Democratization, 30(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2130259
King, R. (2022). Networked insurgence and an anti-electoral democracy: Bangkok space 2014–2020. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 40(4), 895–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211050942
Lee, Y.-L., & Chang, W.-C. (2022). Mixed Constitutions in East Asia: South Korea and Taiwan as Examples. Law and Ethics of Human Rights, 16(2), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2022-2008
Lewis, S. R., & Bulkan, J. (2022). The political logics of EU-FLEGT in Thailand’s multistakeholder negotiations: hegemony and resistance. Journal of Political Ecology, 29(1), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.2398
McGee, R. (2023). The governance shock doctrine: Civic space in the pandemic. Development Policy Review, 41(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12678
Motal, J. (2022). “Not a Political Virus”: Manufacturing Consent by Czech Public Service Media in the Pandemic. Central European Journal of Communication, 15(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.15.1(30).1
Mukherjee, U. K., Bagozzi, B. E., & Chatterjee, S. (2023). A Bayesian framework for studying climate anomalies and social conflicts. Environmetrics, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2778
Nguyen-Van-Quoc, T., & Trell, E.-M. (2023). I choose fish: Understanding informal civil society in Vietnam through environmental grievances and actions. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 41(4), 656–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221148032
Páez, M. C., Joosten, G. G., & Sardi, M. L. (2022). Analysis of the changes in the morphology of Pre- and Post-Hispanic queros housed in Museum collections of Argentina. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103510
Paina, L., Rodriguez, D. C., Zakumumpa, H., Mackenzie, C., Ssengooba, F., & Bennett, S. (2023). Geographic prioritisation in Kenya and Uganda: A power analysis of donor transition. BMJ Global Health, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010499
Phiri, K., Ndlovu, S., Khumalo, S., Ncube, S. B., & Nyathi, D. (2022). Multiplying Faces and Amplifying Voices: Do Women’s Lives Matter in Local Governance Politics in Gwanda, Zimbabwe? Journal of Asian and African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096221137658
Pratt, J., & Lutyens, D. (2022). The pandemic as an antidote to populism: Punishment, immobilisation, and COVID-19. Archiwum Kryminologii, 44(1), 283–311. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2021.15
Samarkina, I. V, Miroshnichenko, I. V, & Borisko, O. A. (2022). The Subjective Space of Youth Policy: Theoretical Model and Regional Projections (the case of the Krasnodar territory). Polis (Russian Federation), 5, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.05.08
Shang, G., & Yang, L. (2023). Practicing and Managing Foreign Toponyms in China: Cultural Politics and Ideologies. Names, 71(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5195/names.2023.2435
Shiffman, J., & Shawar, Y. R. (2022). Framing and the formation of global health priorities. The Lancet, 399(10339), 1977–1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00584-0
Sokolova, T. (2023). Co-producing ‘The Future(s) We Want’: How does political imagination translate into democratised knowledge-action models for sustainability transformations? Environmental Science and Policy, 144, 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.03.018
Urinboyev, R., & Eraliev, S. (2022). Informal civil society initiatives in non-Western societies: mahallas in Uzbekistan. Central Asian Survey, 41(3), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2022.2058915
Zuboff, S. (2022). Surveillance Capitalism or Democracy? The Death Match of Institutional Orders and the Politics of Knowledge in Our Information Civilization. Organization Theory, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221129290
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Internasional Journal of Politics and Public Policy (IJPPP)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms.
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png?raw=true)
.jpg?raw=true)
