Research Trends of Opposition Political Parties in the World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70214/xj6fmk36Keywords:
Opposition, Politics, PartyAbstract
This study aims to study the trend of opposition political party research in the world to see the interest of authors in various countries regarding the theme of opposition political parties in the world and their language coverage. The research method applied in this study is a systematic literature review using 324 scientific articles sourced from the Scopus Database. Article review using the Vosviewer application. The results of the study show that in 2023 to 2024 there was a decrease in interest in the theme of opposition political parties as seen from the decrease in the number of articles uploaded to the Scopus database. Then Gizem Melek became the dominant author in researching related topics, with a total of 4 publications from 324 articles uploaded throughout 2023-2024 in the Scopus database. England is the dominant country in the list of articles on the theme of opposition political parties, with 63 articles uploaded from that country. The scope of discussion with the scope of social sciences is the main dominance of the analysis results, with a presentation of 64.7%. The results of this study contribute to the development of a research roadmap on opposition political parties. The limitation of this study is that the articles used are only sourced from the Scopus database, so that the research findings cannot comprehensively describe the problems faced by opposition political parties around the world. Therefore, further research needs to use scientific articles from other reputable international databases, such as Web of Science and Dimensions Scholars.
References
Aksoy, D., Menger, A., & Tavits, M. (2023). The Effect of Curfews on Political Preferences. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 67(1), 94–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027221109788
Al-Fadhat, F., & Choi, J.-W. (2023). Insights From The 2022 South Korean Presidential Election: Polarisation, Fractured Politics, Inequality, and Constraints on Power. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 53(4), 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2164937
Baranowski, P., Kruschinski, S., Russmann, U., Haßler, J., Magin, M., Márton, B., Ceron, A., Jackson, D., & Lilleker, D. (2023). Patterns of Negative Campaigning during the 2019 European Election: Political Parties’ Facebook Posts and Users’ Sharing Behaviour across Twelve Countries. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 20(4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2115598
Behrens, L., Nyhuis, D., & Gschwend, T. (2024). Political ambition and opposition legislative review: Bill scrutiny as an intra-party signalling device. European Journal of Political Research, 63(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12583
Bondarenko, O. (2023). Between Loyalty and Opposition The Communist Party of Russia and the Growing Intra-Party Cleavage. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 56(4), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2023.1996780
Carlotti, B. (2023). A divorce of convenience: exploring radical right populist parties’ position on Putin’s Russia within the context of the Ukrainian war. A social media perspective. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(4), 1452–1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2171969
Casiraghi, M. C. M., & Bordignon, M. (2023). The rhetorical contestation of populism in four European parliaments (2010–2020). West European Politics, 46(1), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.2013655
Fahey, J. J., Roberts, D. C., & Utych, S. M. (2023). Principled or Partisan? The Effect of Cancel Culture Framings on Support for Free Speech. American Politics Research, 51(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221087601
Karlsson, C., Mårtensson, M., & Persson, T. (2024). Dimensions of disagreement in EU affairs: is parliamentary opposition driven by left-right or European integration contestation? West European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2024.2307164
Laflamme, L., Milot-Poulin, J., Desrosiers, J., Verreault, C., Fillion, C., Patenaude, N., & Bodet, M. A. (2023). Opposition parties in times of pandemics. Journal of Legislative Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2023.2171542
Loner, E. (2023). Winners or losers? Using Twitter to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic changed the images of political leaders in Italy. Contemporary Italian Politics, 15(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2022.2119191
Melek, G. (2023a). Examining the Role of Political Party Predispositions and Polarized Media on Network Agenda Setting: The Case of Syrian Refugees in Türkiye. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231211796
Melek, G. (2023b). Instagramming the Political Image: Visual Campaigning Strategies of Successful Opposition Candidates in Turkey’s 2019 Mayoral Elections. Visual Communication Quarterly, 30(3), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2023.2232292
Mietzner, M., & Honna, J. (2023). Elite opposition and popular rejection: the failure of presidential term limit evasion in Widodo’s Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 31(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2023.2236542
Ostermann, F., & Wagner, W. (2023). Introducing the parliamentary deployment votes database. Journal of Peace Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433221116655
Paget, D. (2023). A people power philosophy: republican ideology in opposition in Tanzania. Democratization, 30(3), 398–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2150759
Panov, P., & Ross, C. (2023). ‘Mobilized voting’ versus ‘performance voting’ in electoral autocracies: Territorial variations in the levels of support for the systemic opposition parties in Russian municipalities. Regional and Federal Studies, 33(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1962307
Reinsberg, B., & Abouharb, M. R. (2023). Partisanship, protection, and punishment: how governments affect the distributional consequences of International Monetary Fund programs. Review of International Political Economy, 30(5), 1851–1879. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2126513
Saresella, D. (2023). Lega Nord: between mistrust of the Church, traditionalist sympathies and neo-pagan alternatives (beginnings). Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 28(3), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2022.2133282
Skjönsberg, M. (2023). Patriots and the Country party tradition in the eighteenth century: the critics of Britain’s fiscal-military state from Robert Harley to Catharine Macaulay. Intellectual History Review, 33(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2145928
Vaughan, M., & Heft, A. (2023). Anti-elitism in the European Radical Right in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13347
Weisskircher, M., Hutter, S., & Borbáth, E. (2023). Protest and Electoral Breakthrough: Challenger Party-Movement Interactions in Germany. German Politics, 32(3), 538–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2044473
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Galang Raga Sitandang, Muhammad Firdaus, Agustiyara (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms.
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
.png?raw=true)
.jpg?raw=true)
